Questions (FAQ):  

Q. Whereas:  Privacy from government spying is a chief cornerstone of our liberties, enshrined in the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution; and
Whereas:  The NSA is collecting BILLIONS of records on law-abiding American citizens – including our phone records, text messages, emails, Internet searches, Facebook posts, instant messages, and online purchases; and
Whereas:  No government in the history of mankind – not even the Communist East German Stasi - has ever held the massive spying power our federal government holds over law-abiding U.S. citizens today; and
Whereas:  Section 215 of the so-called "PATRIOT" Act is what statists point to in order to justify their bulk collection of private information on American citizens;

 

A.  "The Fourth Amendment (Amendment IV) to the United States Constitution is the part of the Bill of Rights that prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures and requires any warrant to be judicially sanctioned and supported by probable cause. It was adopted in response to the abuse of the writ of assistance, a type of general search warrant issued by the British government and a major source of tension in pre-Revolutionary America." I personally object to the big brother approach where an American citizen is under question without a cause, or when the government cannot trust the American citizen to abide by the laws of the land, the government is looking over the shoulders of the average American citizen. When the government cannot trust its people then the government is not trustworthy. We elect representatives to serve the people of this nation with honor, not control the people as when a part of the British Empire.
"The idea that a 
government's legitimacy and moral right to use state power is only justified and legal when consented to by the people or society over which that political power is exercised."

Q. I'm looking into candidates for our next presidential election, and I'm glad to see that you're a man who believes in our all-loving Lord our God. I can't find a page with your views on the countless sinful killings that the American government is carrying out through our overseas wars and prison death sentences, and I would like to know what you would do about this as president of our nation, following a god who specifically instructed humans not to kill our brothers and sisters in the Ten Commandments.

A. In many a case we can pick out Scriptures that satisfy our desire which often is in disagreement to the Holy Scriptures.

Deuteronomy 19

19 And thine eye shall not pity; but life shall go for life, eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot.

Numbers 35:30

30 Whoso killeth any person, the murderer shall be put to death by the mouth of witnesses: but one witness shall not testify against any person to cause him to die.

Numbers 35:31

31 Moreover ye shall take no satisfaction for the life of a murderer, which is guilty of death: but he shall be surely put to death.

 

Q. Welfare? Facing $1 billion deficit, (X) State sharply limits welfare

 

A.  How can we expect a populace to maintain when the government cannot maintain. The spiraling cost of goods and services make larger demands on the average citizen, so maybe it is about time that we real in the big spenders. It practically take an income of at least $1500 to $3000 per month to keep from relying upon some type of support in parts of our nation, and even more in other parts of our nation, and that amount does not include the necessary cost of medical care. We elect leaders to look out for our welfare not criticize us. There will always be those not willing to carry their responsibility, and certainly we intend for everyone to get involved and we need programs that allow for the forward movement of the populace from dependency to survival ability. As a candidate for President, I would like to see every American citizen involved in the growth of this Nation.
Willie Felix Carter
Candidate for President 2016

 

Q. Now here is another example of obscene federal overreach: The Supreme Court recently heard the case of Marvin Horne, the owner of Raisin Valley Farms, who has been fighting a New Deal era regulation that limits how many raisins he is allowed to grow. Under this law federal agents can seize any excess crops and the government can then sell them off. The farmer sees no profit from this. In fact, in the case of Horne, he was fined $695,000 in addition to having his raisins seized. So we now have laws that prohibit farmers from growing a lot of food because they risk hefty fines and the loss of the products of their labor if they do. Personally, I find this sort of action by government intolerable. 

Q.  I would like to know Willie Carter's stance on immigration-- particularly whether we should make it easier or harder for immigrants to come here.

A. Immigration should always be open and accessible to those desiring to become a citizen of the United States of America, but our laws must be followed, and if a law is unjust must be changed to be fair.

Q. It is time to cut back on government handouts to private organizations.

A. as President, I will do my best to insure that Taxpayer's monies are wisely spent, and I will work to insure that monies granted to private organizations to assist in economic growth is repaid back to the government as soon as possible. I do believe that at certain times the governments help can be a very import tool in preventing massive business failures when the economy is sluggish, inspiring investment to keep the business functioning rather than a large number of business failures with can be detrimental to our nation overall, massive layoffs, high unemployment.

Q. I would like to know Willie Carter's stance on the federal death penalty.

A. The death penalty is necessary to deter those considering murder, especially when it can be proven by two qualified witnesses that the murder was premeditated, I believe that with the proof of evidence, witnessed by at least two qualified witnesses, the person or persons found guilty should be executed, a payment for the life or lives of those murdered by the person or persons committing the murder.

Q. I would like to know what Willie Carter's stance would be on military action in Iraq and Syria.

A. An age old tactic of war: being drawn away from home entering a conflict without proper redard for one's personal defense. Resourses to engage in a conflict always draw from resources necessary to defend one's property. how much can the American people afford to invest in the IRAQ and SYRIA conflict with lives and expensive military equiptment which must be replaced to continue our nation's defense? Certainly, we are an integral part of the World community: But we must maintain our military structure at home first. I believe that the responsibility for World peace lies in cooperation in the World community, not going it alone. That requires time and international involvement on the part of all nations concerned about the ruthless destroying of innocent lives as we see in IRAQ and SYRIA. There has to be put in place a comprehensive plan to uncover those responsible, and to bring them to trial, and I believe that is only possible with proper intelligence, military intervention both Air and ground power. I believe that my first priority as President is the security of this nation, the United States of America, we must be wise as a nation, seeing that Russia and China have been building their force capability, we must be prepared for any contingency. I read an article on our nuclear preparedness, and I saw room for updating our system which requires a large part of our national expenditures. With the large number of people in our nation out of work or working for low wages, many business closures, affordability of Healthcare, affordable living conditions, and the list continues. All of these things must be taken into consideration, and as President, which I hope to be, I must perform well to make for a happy and safe nation for all of the People. 

Thank you and,

God Bless America
Willie Felix Carter